Monthly Archives: October 2018

The Runic Spear of Rozwadów

PublishedOctober 28, 2018 Post authortorino

Rozwadów is a town southeast of Sandomierz on the river San. Nowadays it’s basically a suburb of Stalowa Wola. In 1932 local workers discovered a cremation grave with pieces of a spear there. The spear was one of the few that had inscriptions on it including some form of writing. The Polish archeologist Marcjan Śmiszko published a study of the spear in the Polish publication Archeological News (Wiadomości Archeologiczne), the oldest Polish archeological journal. Śmiszko thought he discovered the word KRLUS on the spear. What does KRLUS mean? A number of hypotheses were put together (and repeated mindlessly by others). Mees, Pallych and then Garbacz came up with their theories. Most recently, an interpretation of the writing has been put forth translating it as either: [i]k (e)r(u)ls, or [i]k (e)rlas. Both are “East Germanic”. But what does this spear actually look like?

Well, the spear picture is available in the original Śmiszko article:

Here is the flip side which does not contain writing but only symbols:

This is Śmiszko’s interpretation of the same:

In case it’s not obvious, there is no IK ERULS, or IK ERLAS or even KRLUS. There is instead just the following – RPA. In the first instance the “R” is a regular curved Latin “R” – not a runic “R” at all. The supposed *laguz rune looks more like a “P” – though admittedly – maybe it’s an “L” but this is far from clear. Finally, the “A” is also quite like a Latin “A”. Nothing special here.

But what about the alleged “k” (*kaunan) or the “s” (*sōwilō)? They are impossible to see in the above. Here is a highlighted version for better visibility – even here, it’s not clear whether they really are runes – they may be small etchings or just represent damage to the artifact.

Note too how much smaller they are than the other letters. The spear is damaged but yet somehow these much smaller “letters” manage to “fit” which suggests that whatever they are, they were not part of the original inscription. But, hey, you can see what you want if you are desperately looking to see if you can locate some runic letters.

Rosettes & Other Such Symbols

PublishedOctober 26, 2018 Post authortorino

Continuing on the topic of rosettes (see here and here and here for earlier iterations, including a version with the God Esus). Here are some late antiquity rosettes (in the Bavarian artifact alongside alternating swastikas whatever their meaning may have been back then).

Kemathen (Kipferberg) Warrior
(Krieger aus Kemathen)
Germany (Bavaria)
early to mid 5th century?

This has been classified as the “first Bavarian”. Strictly as a matter of looking at a where this warrior died, I suppose that’s true.

Note that Kemathen pops up all over south German geography. You have:

Kemathen (Kipferberg)
Kematen Bad Feilnbach
Kemathen (Arnstorf)
Kematen an der Ybbs (Austria)
Kematen in Tirol (Austria)
Kematen an der Krems (Austria)
Kematen am Innbach (Austria)

The etymology of this is unclear but (perhaps like the Polish kmieć, kmiotek, kmiotówna, kmiotowic, kmiotaszek, kmiecy that Brueckner brings up) it comes from the Latin comites or, maybe, the Latin comites has the root as these words (compare with »kmetones regni« cited by Brueckner) – basically, a wealthy villager – originally, perhaps, meaning a war companion (who then settled down).

Zamość
Poland
first half of the fifth century?

This pic and the next one come from the “Barbarian Tsunami” presentation which, while fancifully named, fails to prove that any such tsunami actually took place in north central Europe.

Zagórzyn
Poland
second quarter of the fifth century?

Note that the non-highlighted cross (Sun symbol?) on the left side is the same as is shown (there highlighted in yellow) in the Kemathen picture.

Similar rosettes have been seen in a number of places around the world.

Interestingly, for the above also as part of the so-called Vermand treasure (which also included Stars/Shields of David, symbols that, quite interestingly, were adopted rather late as a symbol of Judaism). These had been interpreted as Sarmatian (for more on that you can check out Deborah Schorsch’s “The Vermand Treasure: A Testimony to the Presence of the Sarmatians in the Western Roman Empire”). But Vermand had been sacked in 406 by the “Vandals, Suevi and Alans” so the question is of the dating of that treasure.

As a follow up, here is another – this time eight-pedaled – rosette from a belt buckle – now in Cracow (likely from Mokra, Silesia):

And here are some other examples (can’t recall from which article) from Cecele, Siemiatycze (“Wielbark”), Mokra again (“Przeworsk”) and Tiszaladány, Hungary:

Note that the combination of the eight- or six-pedaled rosette with the swastika has a long history as well with examples from Mycenaean, Greek (for example, on the Dipylon krater in the National Archeological Museum in Athens; simpler solar symbols along with swastikas can be seen on a chariot artifact from Dupljaj or Duplaj in Serbia) and Armenian cultures. Finally, note this piece from the useful nutjobs at Ahenenerbe.

This is supposedly “Westgothic”, which may actually be true given that the rosette ended up being highly popular in Visigothic Spain.

Strangers in Africa

Published Post authortorino

How tough it is to separate Suavic from Germanic names in practice (since most of the former, oddly, seem to be encompassed by experts within the latter), you can see from the following (Anthologia latina) funerary epitaph about the passage of the infant Damira, the daughter of [O]aegis[l]:

The inscription itself comes from Africa and yet Damir is a Suavic name. On the little that is known of Vandalic see here. For another strangely Slavic name from Dacia, see here.

Damira may well be Suavic but also may be Turkic or Hebrew (‘long live the world’! That is itself crazy because it would suggest Suavic – Hebrew connections) – also recall the Venetian opera Damira Placata). Strangely, in Egypt there is a town called Damira (which had a Jewish community) in the Nile delta just southwest of a town called Shirbin (or Sherbin) (Serbin?).

Oageis’ is itself a strange name but seems more Germanic than Slavic. Oageis[l]? Compare this with the flipped letters in Geisa-.

Was her mother Suavic?

This is from Albrecht Greule (that Oageis was a “Vandal” is, of course, just an assumption):

Strela

Published Post authortorino

Ok to oblige some of our readers. Here is Mount Strela just south of Lake Veneticus (i.e., the Bodensee).

The word strzała present in Polish is described by Brueckner as an Ur-word and present among all Slavs – but not Balts. According to the definition currently plastered in Wiktionary, the Slavic word comes from the Proto-Slavic *strěla, from Proto-Indo-European *strel-, *strēl-, from *ster- (“line, streak, stripe; jet, spurt; beam”).

A variant also exists in a German version as in strahlen meaning “radiate” with Strahl meaning a “ray.” The Wiktionary would view it as coming from Middle High German strāle, from Old High German strāla, from Proto-Germanic *strēlaz, *strēlō (“arrow, ray, beam”), from Proto-Indo-European *strēl-, *strēlā- (“arrow, beam”). Compare Dutch straal, English streak. But… this word does not appear to frequent the Scandinavian languages nor did it exist in Gothic and, eventually, seems to have been supplanted by the word “arrow.” As to “arrow” the Online Etymological Dictionary has this to say:

“arrow (n.) – early 14c., from Old English arwan, earlier earh “arrow,” possibly borrowed from Old Norse ör(genitive örvar), from Proto-Germanic *arkhwo (source also of Gothic arhwanza), from PIE root *arku-, source of Latin arcus (see arc (n.)). The ground sense would be “the thing belonging to the bow.” Meaning “a mark like an arrow” in cartography, etc. is from 1834. A rare word in Old English. More common words for “arrow” were stræl (which is cognate with the word still common in Slavic and once prevalent in Germanic, related to words meaning “flash, streak”) and fla, flan (the -n perhaps mistaken for a plural inflection), from Old Norse, a North Germanic word, perhaps originally with the sense of “splinter.” Stræl disappeared by 1200; fla became flo in early Middle English and lingered in Scottish until after 1500. To add to that the German language word for an arrow today is Pheil.”

It is curious that in Slovene strela refers to the lightning flash. It seems that this definition is closest to what one might imagine is happening on top of a mountain. That is to say, lightning strikes mountains rather than arrows. Of course, one can keep both meanings if one proposes that the arrows are those of a Lightning God such as Yassa. (Note that Piorun aka Perun was not strictly speaking a God of Lightning but of Thunder – but Piorun or Perun can be brought into this as well – note that piron in Venetian and πιρούνι (piroúni) in Greek each refers to a “fork” which is exactly what lightning looks like – see here).

Finally, note that in Portuguese and Galician you have estrela meaning “star”. In Spanish you have estrella although the double l is pronounced differently (like a “y”). The “star” explanation (which is likely cognate too with the stary meaning “old” and with ostry meaning “sharp” (think how you squint your eyes) in Slavic).

For completeness, note that the official explanation of the name is from the Latin striga or Romansh stria – both meaning a “witch.” It is interesting to think of witches streaking (!) on lightning (in lieu of broomsticks – seems faster and, well, flashier) but stryga is also present in Slavic languages also meaning “witch”.

I personally, like the arrow of lightning explanation better than a star explanation as it seems more believable in the context of a mountain. A Slavic etymology seems more than probable given the proximity to the Slovenes and the presence of a number curiously Slavic looking place names nearby.

Ksiądz or Xšaça

PublishedOctober 20, 2018 Post authortorino

The Polish word ksiądz refers to a priest but it has other related meanings. For example, its diminutive, księżyc means the Moon. That is a little ksiądz. But why would the moon be called the little priest? Well, it does not. As Brückner correctly points out, the word ksiądz referred to a duke, prince or lord and, hence księżyc refers to a little duke, lord or, yes, prince. The “big” duke, prince, lord, etc., was, supposedly, the Sun – Brückner’s magnus dominus.

Maybe. But what Brückner gets wrong is the derivation of the word. He says that the Slavic as well as Baltic (kuni(n)gas) and Finnish (kunigas) come from the German König, that is “king”. Oddly, he also observes, that that name is not present in Gothic. Whatever the merits of Brückner’s derivation of the Lithuanian or Finnish etymology of their kuningases, the Slavic word just does not seem to fit. In fact, the Slavs may well have a term for a ruler that is derived from or at least similar to the German (and Finnish, Baltic). It is kniaź where the g > ź, probably.

But what about the Polish ksiądz? Well, the answer may be found on the borders of ancient Persia in the famous Behistun (or Behistan) inscription. That inscription celebrates the victories of Darius over local rebels. This is the inscription that famously features placenames such as Asagarta which has been interpreted to mean Sagartia but also to be a potential shoe-in candidate for a namesake of Asgard. There, in Persian lands we see the word xšaça be used in a number of places. The University of Texas at Austin has a great linguistics department and, more relevantly, an excellent website that discusses some old languages and the below text comes from there.

<xšaça-> ‘kingship, sovereignty, kingdom‘ — [Pokorny kþē(i)-, kþə(i)- :: to gain, acquire, possess]

41- ašiyava utā Pārsa utā Māda utā aniyā dahyāva xšaçam hauv

42 – agarbāyatā Garmapadahya māhyā IX raucabiš θakatā āha avaθā xšaçam

50 – tyam magum xšaçam dītam caxriyā kārašim hacā daršam atarsa

59 – dahyāuš Mādaiy avadašim avājanam xšaçamšim adam adīnam vašnā

60 – Auramazdāha adam xšāyaθiya abavam Auramazdā xšaçam manā frābara

R1a in Europe

Published Post authortorino

This is about a year old and likely needs to be supplemented plus the author was apparently mostly focused on R1b plus some items there seem a bit off. Nevertheless, it’s a cool summary for people interested in the arrival of R1a in Europe (highlighted – purple dots but slightly different than the R1b-U106 purple dots). Note that these R1as are not necessarily ancestral to Balto-Slavic clades of R1a – nevertheless they indicate the appearance of the various R1a cousins. All of this was assembled by Iain McDonald at the University of Manchester and you can find the full presentation here.

Acta Visitationis Pragensia (1382)

PublishedOctober 18, 2018 Post authortorino

Here is a copy of a short piece by Vincenc Jan Zíbrt (Čeněk Zíbrt), Český lid, I (1892), page 186. This too was made part of Karl Meyer’s collection in his Fontes. It describes a visitation by higher clergy in a local parish. These were common, usually undertaken by a bishop (in this case an archdeacon) to see how things were going in the country side for the local priests, check out their progress in evangelizing, to show their authority and to spy around. Apparently, during a visitation to a town (Kralovice by Plasy) it came to light that one of the inhabitants, a tailor, was a of the belief that he had a sprite living in his house who helped to watch over the house. The gosling or sprite referred to in the below note is likely a skřítek (Czech) or skrzat (Polish).

“The local priest says that some Holybrius, a tailor, likewise says, that he has a household godling in his home of whom he [the tailor] says that he looks out [listens] for thefts and helps with other [house] problems. Thereupon, the lord archdeacon Paul ordered that the same tailor should personally appear in front of the archdeacon the next morning.”

Plebanus dicit, quod quidam Holybrius sartor ibidem dicit, se habere penatem in domo sua, a quo dicit se audire furta et excessus alios releuari. Ibi quoque dominus Paulus archidiaconus mandavit, quod idem sartor cras mane coram eodem archidiacono personaliter compareat. – Vicarius ibidem dicit de Holibrio sartore ut supra.

#streberfail

PublishedOctober 17, 2018 Post authortorino

A reader had sent me a copy of the Barbarian Tsunami booklet regarding “migrations” in Poland. I haven’t had a chance to go through this in detail but a cursory glance at some of the nonsense described therein is not encouraging. Aside from the poor translation of the Polish, the writing is that of ideologically-constrained dilettantes.

Basically, the theme is that during the Communist times, the political mantra was that Poland had been occupied from times immemorial by Slavs and the organizers of this project resented that. Now, that Poland is democratic, the organizers are free to spread their own theories which – they claim – are based on facts. Those theories suggest the presence of Germanic tribes in Poland and that the Slavs came from somewhere else. These new theories are also based on facts and are politically unbiased because we live in a world where we have democracy and truth, politics does not exist and truth can finally emerge from its hibernation… yadda yadda yadda.

I will have more to say about that but here are some pearls of fancy that were made up by the drafters of this silliness. (Note that these guys are much more cavalier in identifying every object they find with a very specific ethnic group than any archeologist in the West would dare now do):

“A much less known fact and one that we find very exciting is that the peoples involved the most in the upheaval – Goths, Vandals, Herules, Gepids and Burgundians – had issued from the lands between the Odra and the Vistula.”

Not one shred of evidence about any of this – at least as regards Vandals, Herules or Gepids. By the fourth century, all these people are recorded in Ukraine – not Poland. With the possible exception of some portion of the Goths who likely landed from Scandinavia somewhere around Gdansk (or just maintained an emporium there?) and, if you believe Ptolemy, Burgundians, none of these peoples can be placed in Poland.

“Among the best known materials are those discovered within the complex of settlements at Gąski-Wierzbiczany in Kuiavia, a central place of the Vandals. Some of these are discussed below by Marcin Rudnicki.”

I am curious how these guys know that these were “Vandal” sites (and central sites no less!). I mean, they could just as easily have been Japanese or Aztec “sites”.

“The same year, the Vandals settled in southern and central Poland, and on the upper Tisa River, the Alans and Suebians living on the middle Danube, burst into Gaul, which they cruelly plundered for a full three years and then moved to Spain.”

This run-on sentence is pure bullshit. First of all there is no evidence of any tribes that could be called Vandals anywhere in Poland with the – possible – exception of very southern Poland. The only, and indeed, the first, place that any Vandals are actually recorded is the Tisa. I understand the reference to the “upper” as trying to “move” the Vandals closer to Poland.

Secondly, there is zero evidence from whence the Vandals, Alans and Suevi that entered Gall came from other than, presumably, somewhere east of the Rhine (since they had to cross it).

Third, we don’t even know who exactly crossed the Rhine but it seems it was a hell of a lot of different peoples. Jerome gives the following list:

“Quadi, Vandals, Sarmatians, Alans, Gepids, Herules, Saxons, Burgundians, Alemanni and the armies of the Pannonians”

Fourth, putting aside that the above list does not actually list any Suebi, if we were to include Suebi, we probably should write (like the ancient writers) Suevi and not Suebi (like the ossified 19th century Prussian historians).

Fifth, “cruelly plundered” seems like a bit of rhetoric better fitting a Christian or Roman eyewitness of the events rather than a detached scientist.

“Having issued from the lands in the Odra and the Vistula drainage basin the Germanic Goths, Vandals, Gepides, Herules and Burgundians would go on play an important part in the emergence of a new, medieval Europe. It would be incorrect to say that the Migration Period brought destruction only; it was also the beginning of a new order on our continent.”

“Having issued from the writer’s feverish imagination” would have been better said.

“The Przeworsk culture people were mostly Vandals, but presumably included some Lugians, a group which a few centuries earlier had established a powerful organised society which contributed to the emergence of the Przeworsk culture.”

This is an almost verbatim plagiarism of Herwig Wolfram’s failed attempt to reconcile the fact that Poland was, in fact, occupied by the Lougi/Legii with his enormous desire to place the Vandals there instead. Wolfram’s attempt was pulled out of his ass. Now it looks like we have someone trying to make a carbon copy of that watery turd.

“There is evidence from archaeology as well on the presence in the Kraków-Częstochowa Upland (Polish Jura) in late 4th and early 5th century of the Vandals (the Przeworsk culture people) but also, of Gothic immigrants from the territory of present-day Ukraine.”

Again, how is Przeworsk “Vandalic”? I’d really like to know. Artifacts? Even assuming these artifacts were Scandinavian in (ethnic) origin, it’s a far cry to suggest that they must have been Vandalic given that Vandals are not recorded in Poland… But, if, as I suspect, the idea is to inculcate Poles with the notion that they are immigrants in their own homeland, then why not skip the Vandalic middleman and go straight to the heart of the matter? After all there are tons of Arab dirhams found all over Poland. Why not declare that this is evidence of massive Arab presence in Poland in the middle ages? (rab > rob > worker?)

One thing about that paragraph does deserve some attention. The author suggests a (presumably return in his telling) migration of Goths to Poland from Ukraine. It would behoove scientists to look at the question (particularly given the centum character of Tocharian and recent R1b finds among Sarmatians) of whether the Goths and other Scandinavians may indeed have come – relatively late – from the Pontic Steppe.

“Recent finds from western Lesser Poland suggest the arrival in late 4th and early 5th century to this region also of a group of Goths from the territory of present-day Ukraine. Finds displaying Hunnic traits, like burials excavated at Jakuszowice and Przemęczany, show that in the early Migration Period the western region of Lesser Poland was under the control of the nomads and their allies. Presumably, this situation was accepted by groups of Vandals still living there.”

Again, no Vandals. But if there had been Vandals there, then, yeah, I am sure they would have “accepted this situation.” Assuming they desired to continue living there (or just living). The author seems almost apologetic in explainng why and how his übermensch Vandals “accepted” the overlordship of “nomads and their allies.”

“Echoes of these events are to be found in the written record. The bulk of the population of the Przeworsk culture may safely be identified with the Vandals.”

Whenever I see phrases such as “there is no doubt” or “may safely be assumed” I get this gnawing feeling that nothing could be further from the truth. But, hey, maybe it’s just paranoia…

“Presumably, the Vandals who remained in their homeland in Poland, are those immortalised by Procopius of Caesarea. He noted that in 439–477, the reign of king Geiseric, the Vandals in Africa received an embassy of their compatriots still residing in their ancestral abodes come to sure that the former had no intention of returning North. In this context highly intriguing are some references which recur in the early medieval written record. In his hagiography of Saint Ulrich written in 983–993, Gerhard of Augsburg repeatedly refers to Mieszko I as the duke of the Vandals (dux Wandalorum, Misico nomine). What could be the source of this piece of intelligence recorded in the late 10th century? Could it be that the descendants of the Vandals had actually survived in central Poland, or – as some historians claim – had the provost of the Augsburg Cathedral simply misspelt the German name Wenden (Slavs)? For an answer to this and many other questions we have to look to the future.”

As I’ve written before… assuming that such an embassy did in fact take place and Procopius did actually find out about it, the “ancestral abodes” of the Vandals would much more likely have been in places such as:

Spain
France
Romania/Hungary (even Czechia)

All places in which Vandals had been living for over 2 centuries before. But, if we must look further in time and, if in fact there was such a thing as Vandals back then, then I would look in Scandinavia – not Poland.

As regards the fact that half a millennium later Gerhard of Augsburg thought Poles were Vandals (and others thought they were Goths or Sarmatians or Illyrians), well, I would refer these fine archeologists to Roland Steinacher’s Phd thesis or his little write up Wenden, Slawen, Vandalen. Eine frühmittelalterliche pseudologische Gleichsetzung und ihr Nachleben ~~bis ins 18.~~ bis ins 21. Jahrhundert.

In any event, it seems to me that the Vandals may well have been named after the Wends whose territories – likely in East Germany – they may have occupied.

Certain Portions of the Chronicle of Adémar of Chabannes – The γ Version

PublishedOctober 14, 2018 Post authortorino

The Chronicle of Adémar de Chabannes (the legendary, chronicler, musical composer and literary forger extraordinaire) has been well known for years (as Chronicon Aquitanicum et Francicum or Historia Francorum). It contains a number of mentions of Suavic rulers that originated mostly in other sources. In other words they are not particularly original and do not possess new information (for example, Thrasco and other Suav rulers are mentioned but the sources of Ademar’s here are likely the various Frankish or abbey annals). However, the third book of the Chronicle is mostly original. Moreover, one redaction of the Chronicle contains an interesting passage in that book that is not found in other versions.

A portion of this passage deals with the activities of Saint Adalbert (Wojciech) and Saint Bruno among the peoples of Prussia, Poland, Russia and Hungary containing some religious motifs albeit only in generalities. This portion probably ones from some Life of Saint Adalbert. Another portion,however, delivers an entirely new and original piece of information – it deals with the opening of the tomb of Charlemagne by Otto III. Ademar writes that upon opening the tomb Charlemagne’s body was discovered sitting untouched by age on a golden throne. That throne Otto sent to Boleslav the Great of Poland in exchange for the body parts of Saint Adalbert [Wojciech] who had been recently killed by the Prussians. (However, it is not entirely clear from this fragment that, as some people maintain, Boleslav had actually been present at Aachen).

Carolus drawn by Chabbanese Adémar himself (under Carolus’ butt, the seat in question)

Interestingly, we now know that this version of the Chronicle was an autograph of Adémar’s. For a description of the issues and controversies surrounding this edition of the Chronicle, you can see an article by Dariusz Andrzej Sikorski from 2002 “The Chronicle of Adémar de Chabannes: A Recovered Source for the Earliest History of Poland” (Kronika Ademara z Chabannes – odzyskane źródło dla najwcześniejszych dziejów Polski – in Polish). This was a review of the then new Pascale Bourgain edition of the Chronicle (oddly, Sikorski or his editor did not realize that Bourgain is a woman). Another Polish article on this is Miłosz Sosnowski’s “Boleslav Chrobry and Charlemagne: Legitimization Between Cult and Imitation.” The “γ” refers to the text that was labeled by Bourgain as such. Note, however, that the Latin text below follows the MGH edition. Note that the person to first bring the attention of Polish historians (in 1902) to this underappreciated fragment was Stanislaw Kętrzyński, the son of none other than the multi-talented Wojciech Kętrzyński (on his theories, see here, here, here, here, here and here).

Book III, Chapter 31
English Version

At this time with Otto II dead, his son Otto, third in act and name, gained the imperial power. Who interested in philosophy and thinking about the riches of Christ, that he might render a double talent before the tribunal of the Judge, he sought to convert by the will of God the peoples in the surrounding areas given over to idols to the worship of God.

In truth, it was two reverend bishops, namely the holy Adalbert archbishop of the city of Prague which lies in the province of Bohemia and also the holy Bruno the bishop of the city of Querfurt which lies in the province of Bavaria, a relative of the same Emperor. The holy Adalbert was of small stature [while] the reverend Bruno was tall.

And whenever Saint Adalbert was in the imperial palace, he would leave alone in the middle of the night for the forest and carried wood on his own shoulders, walking on bare feet, delivering it, none knew, to the poorhouse.* He then prepared the sale of this timber himself. And after many days the Emperor found about this [and said]: “A bishop such as you are should follow this up by teaching to the peoples of the Slavs.”

* compare this with John Capgrave’s fragment on Saint Wenceslas: “propriis humerus ligna deferens, ante fires viduarum et pauperum clam depnebat…”

The bishop kissed the emperor’s feet and quickly agreed [to the emperor’s joking suggestion] to undertake this [mission]; lest the emperor could talk him out of it. And at the bishop’s request in his city of Prague a replacement archbishop was ordained, whom the bishop had selected, and the emperor gladly assented to this. Having made all the necessary preparations, he departed barefooted to the province of the Poles, where no one had heard the name of Christ and began to preach the Gospel.

Bishop Bruno followed his example and requested that the emperor appoint a bishop, by the name of Odalric, for his [Bruno’s] seat whom he had chosen. When this was done he humbly departed for the country of Hungary, that is called White Hungary to differentiate it from that other Black Hungary, by reason of the fact that its population has a brownish color like the Ethiopians.

Lastly, Saint Adalbert converted to the faith of Christ those four provinces that had been of old held [in the grasp] of paganism, that is Poland, Slavania, Waredonia* [and] Cracow. And after he built a foundation of faith, he went for the province of the Pincenatori** to speak to them of the Lord. That people worshipped many fierce idols, [and] after eight days he had come to them and had began to proclaim Christ to them, [but] on the ninth day they found him to have fallen into prayers, piercing him with missiles even of iron, they made a martyr for Christ. Then he [?] cut off the head, submerged the body in a great lake but the head they tossed to the field for the wild beasts. The angel of the Lord accepted the head but the body he set upon the other shore; there he remained immobile and intact and uncorrupted, until such time as a merchant boat passed by his location. And they took the holy treasury [of his body] and delivered it to Slavania. And then the King of Slavania by the name of Boteslav, whom Saint Adalbert had baptized, was given these great gifts and accepted them with honor and built a monastery in his [Adalbert’s] great name and many miracles began to occur through this martyr of Christ. But Saint Adalbert was martyred on the 24th day of April, that is on the ninth day before the Calends of May.

* Wenedonia?
** Prussians?

However, Saint Bruno converted to the Faith the province of Hungary and another that is called Russia. He converted the King of Hungary who is called Gouz* and he changed his name in the baptism and [Bruno] called him Stephen, [he] whom the Emperor Otto received in baptism at the birth of the martyr Stephen and [whose] kingdom he [Otto] allowed him freely to possess, giving him permission to carry the sacred lance everywhere, as it is the custom of the emperor to do so, and the remains of the key of the Lord and the spear of Saint Maurice to replace his own spear. And the above-mentioned king ordered Saint Bruno to baptize his own son, giving him the same name [that is] Stephen.

* Géza
** Stephen I, Géza’s son

And to his son Stephen, the emperor Otto gave away in marriage the sister of Henry, the subsequent emperor….*

[skipping some portions of the narrative about Hungarians – the complete Latin version is below]

* Gisela of Bavaria, the sister of Henry II, future emperor

In those days, the emperor Otto [III] was told in a dream to raise the remains of Charlemagne which were buried at Aachen. But as age erases memory, so was it not known exactly where he had been laid to rest. Yet after a three day fast the emperor had a vision as to where the body was and so it was found sitting on a golden throne in an arched-ceilinged cave under the basilica of the Holy Mary wearing a golden crown set with precious stones and wielding a sword of the purest gold and his body was preserved and unrotten. It was raised and shown to the masses. And one of the canons of that place, Adalbert, though a man sporting a great and tall frame, was shown to have an insufficient brow for having tried to fit on Charlemagne’s crown, it proved to be too wide for the circumference of his head. And comparing his shin too to the shins of the king, he proved the shorter, and also was his shin [by reason of this arrogant deed] broken through Heavenly Might. Going on to live yet forty years he remained nevertheless a cripple forever. And the rediscovered body of Charlemagne was laid to rest on the right side of the basilica right behind the altar of Saint John the Baptist. And there was built over it a wondrous golden crypt which begun at once to glimmer with many portends and miracles. Yet he [Charlemagne] has no holy day of his own, [he is] just [remembered during] the commonly celebrated All Saints Day. His golden throne, the emperor Otto [III] earmarked for king Botislav in exchange for the relics of the holy martyr Adalbert [Wojciech]. And the king Botislav accepted the gift and [in exchange] sent the emperor the martyr’s shoulder and the emperor received it happily and to honor the holy martyr Adalbert he built in Aachen an extraordinary basilica and set in it a convent of [female] servants of the Lord. He also built another monastery in Rome to honor the same martyr.

Latin Version

Ea tempestate Hotone secundo mortuo, Hoto filius eius, tercius actu et nomine, imperio potitus est. Qui philosophiae intentus, et lucra Christi cogitans, ut ante tribunal Iudicis duplicatum redderet talentum, Dei voluntate populos in circuitum ydolis deditos ad Dei cultum convertere studuit.*

* [compare this to the version found in other editions of the Chronicle: Ea tempestate Hotone secundo mortuo, Hoto filius eius, tercius actu et nomine, imperio potitus est. Qui philosophiae intentus, et lucra Christi cogitans, ut ante tribunal Iudicis duplicatum redderet talentum, Dei voluntate populos Ungriae una cum rege eorum ad fidem Christi convertere meruit…]

Etenim erant ei duo episcopi reverentissimi, sanctus videlicet Adalbertus archiepiscopus de civitate Pragra, que est in provincia Bevehem, sanctus etiam Brunus episcopus de civitate Osburg, quę est in provintia Baioarie, consanguineus ejusdem imperatoris. Nam sanctus Adalbertus parvus statura, sanctus Brunus procero corpore erant.

Et quandocumque sanctus Adalbertus in aula imperatoris interesset, nocte intempesta solus ad silvam abiens, ligna propriis humeris, pedibus nudis, deferebat, nemine sciente, ad hospitium suum. Que ligna vendens victum preparabat sibi. Quod cum post multos imperator comperiens dies, cum pro sancto duceret, die quadam solito locutus cum eo, dixit jocando: “Talis episcopus, sicut vos estis, debuisset pergere ad predicandum Sclavorum gentes”.

Mox episcopus pedes imperatoris deosculans, ait, se hoc incipere; nec postea imperator eum avertere potuit ab hac intentione; et rogante ipso episcopo, ordinatus est pro eo in urbe Pragin archiepiscopus, quem elegerat ipse, et libenter imperator assensit. Et preparatis omnibus necessariis, pedibus nudis abiit in Pollianam provinciam, ubi nemo Christi nomen audierat, et praedicare coepit euangelium.

Quod exemplum eius secutus Brunus episcopus, petiit imperatorem, ut pro eo iuberet consecrare in sede sua episcopum, quem elegerat, nomine Odolricum. Quo facto, et ipse humiliter abiit in provinciam Ungriam, quae dicitur Alba Ungria ad differentiam alteri Ungrie Nigre, pro eo quod populus est colore fusco velut Etiopes.

Sanctus denique Adalbertus convertit ad fidem Christi quattuor istas provincias, quae antiquo paganorum errore detinebantur, scilicet Pollianam, Sclavaniam, Waredoniam, Cracoviam. Quas postquam fundavit in fide, abiit in provintiam Pincenatorum, ut eis praedicaret Dominum. Illa gens nimium idolis effera, post octo dies ad eos venerat et Christum eis adnunciare coeperat, nono die reperientes eum orationi incumbere, missilibus quam ferreis confodientes, Christi martirem fecerunt. Deinde secto capite, corpus eius in lacum magnum demerserunt; capud autem bestiis in campum proiecerunt. Angelus autem Domini accipiens capud, posuit iuxta cadaver in ulteriorem ripam; ibi immobile et intactum et incorruptum permansit, quousque negotiatores navigio per illum locum praeterirent. Qui auferentes sanctum thesaurum, patefeceruntque Sclavaniam. Quo comperto rex Sclavanie nomine Botesclavus, quem ipse sanctus Adalbertus baptizaverat, datis magnis muneribus, capud et cadaver excepit cum honore, et monasterium in eius nomine maximum construxit, et multa miracula fieri coeperunt per eundem Christi martirem. Passus est autem sanctus Adalbertus 24. die mensis Aprilis, id est nono Kalendas Mai.

Sanctus autem Brunus convertit ad fidem Ungriam provintiam, aliam, que vocatur Russia. Regem Ungrie baptizavit, qui vocabatur Gouz, et mutato nomine in baptismo Stephanum vocavit, quem Oto imperator in natali protomartiris Stephani a baptismate excepit, et regnum ei liberrime habere permisit, dans ei licentiam ferre lanceam sacram ubique, sicut ipsi imperatori mos est, et reliquias ex clavis Domini et lancea sancti Mauricii ei concessit in propria lancea. Rex quoque supradictus filium suum baptizare iussit sancto Bruno, imponens ei nomen sicut sibi Stephanum.

Et ipsi filio eius Stephano Oto imperator sororem Eenrici, postea imperatoris, in coniugio dedit. At vero sanctus Brunus cum ad Pincenates properavisset, et Christum praedicare cepisset illis, passus est ab eis, sicut passus fuerat sanctus Adalbertus. Nam Pincenati diabolico furore sevientes, viscera omnia ventris per exiguum foramen lateris ei extraxerunt, et fortissimum Dei martirem perfecerunt. Corpus eius Russorum gens magno precio redemit, et in Russia monasterium eius nomini construxerunt, magnisque miraculis coruscare cepit. Post paucos dies quidam Grecus episcopus in Russiam venit, et medietatem ipsius provintiae, quae adhuc idolis dedita erat, convertit, et morem Grecum in barba crescenda et ceteris exemplis eos suscipere fecit. Odolricus autem, qui sancto Bruno successerat, ad Dominum migrans, magnis virtutibus clarere meruit. Ideoque monasterium foris civitatem Osburg eius nomini construxit episcopus item Brunus, successor eius, frater Eenrici imperatoris. Eadem vero urbs apud Romanos vocabatur Valentina ab imperatoris nomine, qui eam condidit primus.

Quibus diebus Oto imperator per somnum monitus est, ut levaret corpus Caroli Magni imperatoris, quod Aquis humatus erat, sed vetustate obliterante, ignorabatur locus certus, ubi quiescebat. Et peracto triduano ieiunio, inventus est eo loco, quem per visum cognoverat imperator, sedens in aurea cathedra, intra arcuatam speluncam infra basilicam Marie, coronatus corona ex auro et gemmis, tenens sceptrum et ensem ex auro purissimo, et ipsum corpus incorruptum inventum est. Quod levatum populis demonstratum est. Quidam vero canonicorum eiusdem loci Adalbertus, cum enormi et procero corpore esset, coronam Caroli quasi pro mensura capiti suo circumponens, inventus est strictiori vertice, coronam amplitudine sua vincentem circulum capitis. Crus proprium etiam ad cruris mensuram regis dimetiens, inventus est brevior, et ipsum eius crus protinus divina virtute confractum est. Qui supervivens annis 40, semper debilis permansit. Corpus vero Caroli conditum in dextro membro basilicae ipsius retro altare sancti Iohannis baptistae, et cripta aurea super illud mirifica est fabricata, multisque signis et miraculis clarescere coepit. Non tamen sollempnitas de ipso agitur, nisi communi more anniversarium defunctorum. Solium eius aureum imperator Oto direxit regi Botisclavo pro reliquiis sancti Adalberti martiris. Rex autem Botisclavus, accepto dono, misit imperatori brachium de corpore eiusdem sancti, et imperator gaudens illut excepit, et in honore sancti Adalberti martiris basilicam Aquisgrani construxit mirificam, et ancillarum Dei congregationem ibi disposuit. Aliud quoque monasterium Romae construxit in honore ipsius martiris.

Mine is the Sunlight, Mine is the Morning

PublishedOctober 10, 2018 Post authortorino

In thinking about the Polish Jove Jassa, we came, repeatedly, into contact with the rosette symbol. This is not too surprising because the rosette, particularly the leafed rosette, has appeared throughout centuries all over the world, usually as a religious symbol. Perhaps the earliest rosette symbol is from these Mycenean coins (1600 BC) from some female graves:

For more cool rosette pics, see here. Also a blog devoted to Spanish (!) Asatru has this interesting post (trying to connect the rosette as the hexapedal star with the Visigoths) – see here.

There was, however, little to connect the God of Light with the rosette (or Flower of Life) other than speculation. The thing that seemed most convincing to me, at least in terms of Polish etymologies is the that the Polish name for ash is jesion and this is the picture of an ash (or jesion) leaf:

Now, jesion, again, means ash and an ash is is an ash and askr Yggdrasil is in Norse mythology, the World Tree which is probably an ash and is very similar to the “tree of life.” For more on Yggdrasil as a “star” (gwez or gwozd) tree see here. Now, there is the fact that the above rosette is also called the Flower of Life.

But all of that is speculation. Then, however, is this fine inscription from, of all places, Cherchell, Algeria (that city being, interestingly, an important conquest of the Vandals):

PEREGRINVS[—
QVODESVS*FVIT*IVBEN[—

or, perhaps:

Peregrinus [—] | quod Esus fuit iuben[s—].

Now, I am not sure I see it but if the above interpretation is right (this means “Peregrinus (name or perhaps just ‘A Traveller’) who worshipped Esus”) then this is direct connection between the rosette and Esus. For more on this see here.

Notice that the writer of this blog, correctly, notes that the above symbol looks like a “sand dollar” but can’t be a sand dollar because a sand dollar has five arms or slits not six. This is correct. But the rosette that has six arms or petals is the Flower of Life which is what this image seems to look like.

You can also get more data from this book (which featured this inscription originally): Philippe Leveau, Nouvelles inscriptions de Cherchel, BAA, t. VII, 1, 1977-1979, p. 111-192. Note that Leveau also wrote rather recently this interesting article: Ésus en Afrique : à propos d’une inscription fragmentaire de Caesarea Mauretaniae commémorant l’exécution d’une injunction d’Ésus; which you can see here.

It is curious that various scholars have suggested that the Polish God Yassa has a Tatar, Uralic/Finno-Ugric, Germanic (Aesir) or even a Celtic origin. In the Celtic religion there was the God Esus (primarily known from Lucan though also on two pillars in France/Germany as well as, perhaps, from an incantation).

Here is a nice rosette which clearly shows these rays or slits as leaves:

In Poland, the symbol also frequently appears on coins (for example from Pyrzyce).

Curiously, the symbol also appears in connection with the Star of David (which, also, was a common symbol before becoming associated with Judaism). That David could be read Da-vid and that Vid/Vit means “lord” and Dadzbog essentially means “May God Give” is curious as well. Here are some rosettes and Stars of David from the Coptic area. These are from a work by the Germanized Polish art historian’s Josef Strzygowski’s “Coptic Art” (Koptische Kunst). He sees these as “Arabic” but given his rather loose methodology, perhaps another look is warranted.

However, note that the geometry of this is not altogether that difficult or unique as explained in this article.