What do we know of the religion of the Germans? Well, you have Tacitus but… you also have an earlier account by no less an authority than Julius Caesar in his Gallic Wars. Here are some sections that Karl Clemens cited in his Fontes historiae religions Germanicae (the translation is from 1869 by W. A. McDevitte and W. S. Bohn).
Book I, 50
“The next day, according to his custom, Caesar led out his forces from both camps, and having advanced a little from the larger one, drew up his line of battle, and gave the enemy an opportunity of fighting. When he found that they did not even then come out [from their entrenchments,] he led back his army into camp about noon. Then at last Ariovistus sent part of his forces to attack the lesser camp. The battle was vigorously maintained on both sides till the evening. At sunset, after many wounds had been inflicted and received, Ariovistus led back his forces into camp. When Caesar inquired of his prisoners, wherefore Ariovistus did not come to an engagement, he discovered this to be the reason-that among the Germans it was the custom for their matrons to pronounce from lots and divination, whether it were expedient that the battle should be engaged in or not; that they had said, ‘that it was not the will of heaven that the Germans should conquer, if they engaged in battle before the new moon.'”
Proximo die instituto suo Caesar ex castris utrisque copias suas eduxit paulumque a maioribus castris progressus aciem instruxit hostibusque pugnandi potestatem fecit. Ubi ne tum quidem eos prodire intellexit, circiter meridiem exercitum in castra reduxit. Tum demum Ariovistus partem suarum copiarum, quae castra minora oppugnaret, misit. Acriter utrimque usque ad vesperum pugnatum est. Solis occasu suas copias Ariovistus multis et inlatis et acceptis vulneribus in castra reduxit. Cum ex captivis quaereret Caesar quam ob rem Ariovistus proelio non decertaret, hanc reperiebat causam, quod apud Germanos ea consuetudo esset ut matres familiae eorum sortibus et vaticinationibus declararent utrum proelium committi ex usu esset necne; eas ita dicere: non esse fas Germanos superare, si ante novam lunam proelio contendissent.
Book I, 53
“Thereupon the engagement was renewed, and all the enemy turned their backs, nor did they cease to flee until they arrived at the river Rhine , about fifty miles from that place. There some few, either relying on their strength, endeavored to swim over, or, finding boats, procured their safety. Among the latter was Ariovistus, who meeting with a small vessel tied to the bank, escaped in it; our horse pursued and slew all the rest of them. Ariovistus had two wives, one a Suevan by nation, whom he brought with him from home; the other a Norican, the sister of king Vocion, whom he had married in Gaul, she having been sent [thither for that purpose] by her brother. Both perished in that flight. Of their two daughters, one was slain, the other captured. C. Valerius Procillus, as he was being dragged by his guards in the fight, bound with a triple chain, fell into the hands of Caesar himself, as he was pursuing the enemy with his cavalry. This circumstance indeed afforded Caesar no less pleasure than the victory itself; because he saw a man of the first rank in the province of Gaul, his intimate acquaintance and friend, rescued from the hand of the enemy, and restored to him, and that fortune had not diminished aught of the joy and exultation [of that day] by his destruction. He [Caius Valerius Procillus or Gaius Valerius Troucillus] said that, in his own presence, the lots had been thrice consulted respecting him, whether he should immediately be put to death by fire, or be reserved for another time: that by the favor of the lots he was uninjured. M. Mettius, also, was found and brought back to him [Caesar.]”
Ita proelium restitutum est, atque omnes hostes terga verterunt nec prius fugere destiterunt quam ad flumen Rhenum milia passuum ex eo loco circiter L pervenerunt. Ibi perpauci aut viribus confisi tranare contenderunt aut lintribus inventis sibi salutem reppererunt. In his fuit Ariovistus, qui naviculam deligatam ad ripam nactus ea profugit; reliquos omnes consecuti equites nostri interfecerunt. Duae fuerunt Ariovisti uxores, una Sueva natione, quam domo secum eduxerat, altera Norica, regis Voccionis soror, quam in Gallia duxerat a fratre missam: utraque in ea fuga periit; duae filiae: harum altera occisa, altera capta est. C. Valerius Procillus, cum a custodibus in fuga trinis catenis vinctus traheretur, in ipsum Caesarem hostes equitatu insequentem incidit. Quae quidem res Caesari non minorem quam ipsa victoria voluptatem attulit, quod hominem honestissimum provinciae Galliae, suum familiarem et hospitem, ereptum ex manibus hostium sibi restitutum videbat neque eius calamitate de tanta voluptate et gratulatione quicquam fortuna deminuerat. Is se praesente de se ter sortibus consultum dicebat, utrum igni statim necaretur an in aliud tempus reservaretur: sortium beneficio se esse incolumem. Item M. Metius repertus et ad eum reductus est.
Book 6, 21
“The Germans differ much from these usages, for they have neither Druids to preside over sacred offices, nor do they pay great regard to sacrifices. They rank in the number of the gods those alone whom they behold, and by whose instrumentality they are obviously benefited, namely, the sun, fire, and the moon; they have not heard of the other deities even by report. Their whole life is occupied in hunting and in the pursuits of the military art; from childhood they devote themselves to fatigue and hardships. Those who have remained chaste for the longest time, receive the greatest commendation among their people; they think that by this the growth is promoted, by this the physical powers are increased and the sinews are strengthened. And to have had knowledge of a woman before the twentieth year they reckon among the most disgraceful acts; of which matter there is no concealment, because they bathe promiscuously in the rivers and [only] use skins or small cloaks of deer’s hides, a large portion of the body being in consequence naked.”
Germani multum ab hac consuetudine differunt. Nam neque druides habent, qui rebus divinis praesint, neque sacrificiis student. Deorum numero eos solos ducunt, quos cernunt et quorum aperte opibus iuvantur, Solem et Vulcanum et Lunam, reliquos ne fama quidem acceperunt. Vita omnis in venationibus atque in studiis rei militaris consistit: ab parvulis labori ac duritiae student. Qui diutissime impuberes permanserunt, maximam inter suos ferunt laudem: hoc ali staturam, ali vires nervosque confirmari putant. Intra annum vero vicesimum feminae notitiam habuisse in turpissimis habent rebus; cuius rei nulla est occultatio, quod et promiscue in fluminibus perluuntur et pellibus aut parvis renonum tegimentis utuntur magna corporis parte nuda.
Of course, the worship of the sun and fire was not something that we normally think of Nordic religion. Instead, we think of “eastern” religions like in this account of the Persians.
Of course, the same could be said of the Suavs who worship:
- Jasion, Jutrebog, Jarowit/Gerovit likely as the “Moon”
- Svarog/Svarozic or Nya as the “fire”
- Dadzhbog – Dag-, Dagon – or Łada as the “Sun”
The moon is the ksiezyc which is a diminutive of ksiadz. Ksiadz (xšaça) used to mean “prince” or “ruler” (see here). Ksiezyc would thus mean “little ruler” so that much like:
- Svarog > Svarozyc
we have:
- Ksiadz > ksiezyc
To recall what Casimir Moszyński has to say (Kultura Ludowa Słowian):
“So Bulgarian and Ruthenian women when talking to little children use the word bog [God]… not only in the normal sense of the word: ‘God; holy icon; cross, but also with the meaning ‘sun‘, ‘moon‘, and ‘fire.'”
Now, many folklorists have done all kinds of gymnastics to try to claim that Caesar’s Germanic Gods were somehow just different versions of Wotan, Thor or Tyr.
And yet that is not what the above says.
And those Germanic names! Where are these Germanic Arios- after all?
Well, we have:
- Ariovistus, as well as,
- Ariamir (Suevi), but to find another Ario- you have to look East,
- Ariobarzanes and that one is, again, in the East (Persia).
Copyright ©2017 jassa.org All Rights Reserved
No! Svarog is not sun. Belebog is.
Svarog is Saturn/Uranus. Svarozic is ‘fire’ similar to prometheus or loki or lucifer as seen by gnostics (not actual Venus).
Svarogi or wilczki is polish ornament of house, it doesn’t require that much astrological knowledge to see that Svarog and wolfes have something to do with zodiac sign Aquarius. But some people still think Svarog is sun due to misleading persian xvar. Svarga is sky, so is Ouranos/Caelus.
Svarga is sky but Svarog clearly has to do with the Sun. Like… oh yeah…. swar as in hot. For that matter, note that the Germanic schwarz = black comes from the same concept as in “burned,” charred, black. Keep the zodiac out of this.
Keep astrology out of religion? No, that is what I refuse to do. Astrology is the key to understanding religions.
Swary aka kłótnie have to do with thoughts. And thoughts have to do with mind and mind has to do with element air and aquarius is air. When everything is Schwarze? At midnight which corresponds to aquarius, (if 24 hours=zodiac then night=winter). Chernobog (compare Kronos), Hlodolet (compare nordic Hlodin), Chworz (compare persian xvar) are other names to capricorn or saturn, and Varg is wolf. Also Varga is important vedic astrological word which means division and also can mean tribe. Saturn is known as black planet.
Ouranos is god of sky and not any kind of sun god.
Apollo/Belenos/Belebog/Baldur on the other hand has something to do with sun.
And Flins/Lwińc god of Sorbians (sign Leo ruled by sun)
I am quite good about any kind of religious knowledge, that’s why I comment here.
When I was young and I didn’t knew astrology I too thought Svarog is a sun god.
If you have difficulty with linking astrology to religion, see some basic facts like “wołosożary are pleiades”. Then which constellation relates to Wołos? It is quite easy.
The Zodiac is a Babylonian construct. it has nothing to do with IE religion. This site is not about Zodiac, Kaballah or other Mesopotamian stuff. I am all for trying to see connections where they can be seen but if you see too many connections you begin to look like John Nash just without the brilliance. For example, Flins may or may not have been a Sorbian God – Flins’s appearance is quite late and dates to one source only. One might say the evidence for Flins is flimsy.
Solem et Vulcanum et Lunam
it actually means Sun and saturn and moon. Vulcan/Hephaestos is linked with Saturn ruling capricorn and element of refined earth/iron.
Btw some capricorn related gods like kronos/cernunnos/vulcan actaully depict aquarius more: vulcan – wilk (aquarian grup/tribe identity), kronos -korona (7th chakra related to aquarius).